Difference between revisions of "A6 Legislative Discussion 2014"

From Second Life Userguide
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ==JANUARY 2014== http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4293 *Reforming Land Sales *by Patroklus Murakami » Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:32 am http://forums.slcds.inf...")
 
(FEBRUARY 2014)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 +
 +
==FEBRUARY 2014==
 +
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4321
 +
*Draft Legislation for a Grievance Committee
 +
*by Lam Erin » Tue Feb 18, 2014 7:01 pm - "I am posting here the draft legislation on the grievance committee which Cadence and I prepared."
 +
 
==JANUARY 2014==
 
==JANUARY 2014==
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4293
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4293
 
*Reforming Land Sales  
 
*Reforming Land Sales  
*by Patroklus Murakami » Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:32 am
+
*by Patroklus Murakami » Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:32 am - "Our current mechanisms for selling land (and thereby establishing citizenship) are open to abuse. It is possible with our current rules for individuals or groups to control access to land sales and thereby to citizenship in the CDS. The way this works is to buy up plots of land whenever they become free and then control who purchases them by only selling (or giving) them to your friends and supporters."
  
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4290
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4290
 
*Recall of RA Members  
 
*Recall of RA Members  
*by Patroklus Murakami » Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:27 pm
+
*by Patroklus Murakami » Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:27 pm - "It has also been suggested that we should empower voters to remove RA members from office if, after the election, they prove to be regularly absent or for some other reason e.g. they behave badly and disrupt meetings or they adopt policy positions which are contrary to the policies they put in their election manifestos."
  
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4269
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4269
 
*By-elections .. the best way to chose?  
 
*By-elections .. the best way to chose?  
*by Shep » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:10 pm
+
*by Shep » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:10 pm - "The SC has given us the task of finding the fairest , quickest and most popular way of carrying out By-Elections .. below is the text from the SC as we the RA received it ..."
  
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4259
 
http://forums.slcds.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4259
 
*Requests to the RA from the SC  
 
*Requests to the RA from the SC  
 
*by Callipygian » Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:13 pm
 
*by Callipygian » Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:13 pm
 +
**Regarding by-elections: "Therefore, the SC requests that the RA consider a law that addresses filling vacant seats on RA in a more timely fashion, whether it be automatic appointment of a candidate in the previous election cycle, based on the voting of that election, or by specifying shorter timeframes for the steps in a byelection cycle, or by some other method that the RA identifies."
 +
**Regarding documentation: "We request that RA consider contracting a qualified writer/editor/reviewer - hired and paid a reasonable real-life contracted rate - to:
 +
***review all laws and the Constitution and identify contradictory and archaic language
 +
***draft appropriate wording to correct these issues
 +
***locate all RA transcripts and add them to the RA journal page of the portal
 +
***review all transcripts and ensure that all laws are accurately recorded in the CDS laws page of the portal
 +
***create a summary of each transcript in the RA Journals, where none exists, to allow efficient review for citizens and members of government. ( Patrolkus did such summaries during his time as archivist, and the current RA will have minutes for this)"
  
 
[[Category:CDS Forum Index 2014]]
 
[[Category:CDS Forum Index 2014]]

Latest revision as of 12:24, 15 March 2014